Most adults do not take to TikTok to speak through a puppet of themselves. However, for Emily Nagoski, a sex educator who WashU is bringing to campus, this is a normal occurrence. While it may seem laughable that someone such as Nagoski exists, the real joke is on you, the student, as it is your tuition dollars that are going to fund her absurd “education.” Even though I’m just a male (and thus Nagoski thinks I am intrinsically evil), I will take up her call for “inclusivity” and include myself in her liberal and naïve Massachusetts bubble in order to learn about her silly beliefs.
Ms. Nagoski seems to be so progressive that she has ‘progressed’ beyond the need for logic, science, and reason, such as with regard to the body positivity movement. Her delusion speaks for itself when she told a doctor that “Standard practice (discussing weight) doesn’t mean evidence-based practice.” Nagoski, however, does not cite the “evidence” that apparently disproves this. Instead of this, she promotes the dangerous lie of “Healthy at Every Size,” demanding that all references to weight be removed from Health Care policy. Whereas some on the Left have made “Medicare for all” their rallying cry, Nagoski’s beliefs could be characterized as “diabetes for all.”
Nagoski considers herself a feminist, even though she might not know what a woman is. By emphasizing rape culture, she conveniently ignores how legally in the UK, a woman cannot rape a man or how the slogan “Believe all women” by the MeToo movement has made it impossible for males falsely accused to have a fair fight or be redeemed. To Nagoski, feminism means blaming men for everything, proving the progressive movement’s hypocrisy over who’s welcome to their ‘safe space’ worldview. For instance, Ms. Nagoski has taken to stereotyping men to an absurd degree. Ironic considering feminists’ emphasis on “my body my choice”. For example, she has stated that “‘Masculinity is a f*cking nightmare a lot of the time. Somebody living with the “you’re a boy” script is taught…sex is the only way he’s allowed to receive love and connection”’. I, being a man, can say that love and connection doesn’t come from sex. To each their own, although Nagoski cannot seem to get that as she wants everyone to follow in her hypersexualized footsteps. And of course, as with all delusional radicals who can’t defend their arguments, her response to actual, true criticism falls under “himpathy, mansplanations, threats, or other assorted patriarchal responses”. Rather than deconstruct gender norms while simultaneously stereotyping men like in her book Come As You Are, why not just let everybody behave and be respected for having free thought and ideas?
But if that were so, then other people would realize that it might just be that ideas from Nagoski’s may not be the best. Other silly ideas include the idea of giving random black women $50 bills. I wonder if (given her support of transgenderism) if she would give me a $50 bill if I identified as a black woman? However, if giving random people $50 is one of her stupidest ideas, it is still nowhere near as ridiculous as the school using the hard-earned money of donors and students to fund her lecture.